The majority of the school's staff had probably completed their state assessments and were waiting for their school to be assessed by Ofsted so they could get the lucrative frontline job in a good school.
We looked at a number of schools and quickly identified two very good ones that had a history of delivering excellent results. These two schools were given the commitment to increase their intake immediately and so were the first two to be given assistance under the £umpire' umbrella. They were given turn over time to meet the needs of the 90 pupils that had been scheduled to come in over the following two years.
We had a very good reception for the first session but were told that this was the wrong way to proceed because we needed time to 'hone in' our assessments. They insisted that the school was going to turn a profit by the end of the decade, which we all hoped would be the case. They were clearly not going to give up on the idea of precise, targeted and sustained intervention. The power of the clients was quite profound.
The clients came to the school. They occupied most of the classrooms. Very few school buildings had been effectively utilized. The school was a what-to-all situation. The clients seemed very simple, direct and easy. At the first session each parent presented his or her child to be assessed. It was incrediblyambiguousand some of the children had not been in school for months, or even years.
At first, when the school assessed the children, they gave each of them a pass/fail mark as far as the summer assessment was concerned. The pass/fail marks were calculated by averaging each child's results with a standard of 100. Those children who had achieved the pass/fail were instructed to attend the following classroom at school for further assessment.
The second part of the assessment was the attendance sheet. The attendance sheet proved to be the most difficult because the school had a policy of not revealing the name of any child who did not attend school. Some children who had not attended school were offered help by the school to promote attendance. There was total agreement that these children needed the opposite direction from the children with learning difficulties. The adults also agreed that these children needed a good educational background if they were to have a successful education (difficult to find that in a failing school).
The third part of the assessment was the practical assessment. It was at this time that each of the children was taken into 'stores' (a cubby hole in the floor) where they were each given a hand held stylus and asked to answer a series of questions. This was to check each child's progress towards achieving their personal potential and success in school. The three most important results from this part of the test were:
How did your school do in relation to the national standards?
What did you do wrong?
What did you do well?
Viewed the bigger picture?
Tried something new?
Overcome the challenge?
Got more out of the assessment?
Then there was the motivational element:
How well could you manage the big challenge?
Ultimately, to get a feel for the nature of the feedback, i.e. whether children were accepting the judgement or not, the following figures were drawn up:
No. of children with parents and teachers that actively promote children's success , (26)
, (26) No. of children who try but fail or give up in the struggle, (...)
, (...) Yes. of children who move from home to school positively, (...)
Positive. (...)
Looking at the big picture - a clear distinction between the pupils that succeed and those that struggle highlights the importance of developing a strong motivation in children to succeed, as well as a genuine desire and effort from the adult to help. This is only achieved when adults are totally committed to supporting children's special needs and making sure that every child has a strong chance to succeed , regardless of their parents or situation at home.
In short, an effective early years education program is a complex set of activities and should be fully structured. It is imperative that feedback be provided on a monthly, quarterly or annual basis, so that plans and materials can be changed and adapted as required. This approach ensures that all learners have the opportunity to ask questions and receive positive and negative feedback, as well as enabling different learners to work at their own pace, to manage their own time stakes and to meet their own personal learning targets.
Patience, tolerance and positivity - are everything to develop, in respect of the learners' ability to manage the impact of the curriculum and the context in which they find themselves.